It obviously isn't about context in that case, it's about drift time. Like twins separated at birth, Meades MWA (Mega Wide Angle) looks nearly identical to the Omegon Panorama2. Anything is possible. The A-T 28UWA/StellarVue 82 and APM 30UFF has already been mentioned in this thread. Click here to simulate the field of view. I doubt this as JOC won't sell eyepieces to any US brand other than ES since 2012. The attractive price makes it easier to collect the complete set of three, along with the 8mm and 4mm models. All marketing. Note: For definitions of basic eyepiece characteristics mentioned below, see Ed Tings A Beginners Guide to Telescope Eyepieces. I really like the 82 FoV in my scope, great image, easy to manage and store. The true field of view is 0.75 degrees, with an exit pupil of about 1.9 mm. You currently have javascript disabled. It's the same at low power, which Ernest just pointed out. Orion sold them as did WO too. This grade conversion formula, together with your degree program's Academic and Examination Regulations (FPSO), is a tool to help your convert grades earned in countries other than Germany. I wouldn't expect additional focal lengths. And there are some very good options.. For wide field eyepieces, TeleVue introduced nearly all the modern designs starting with the first Nagler more than 40 years ago. Please note that this tool is only intended to provide a first orientation and the results are in no way binding. That is unless it's purely coincidental that these appear to be the same as well-known OEM UWAs, and in fact Vic actually designed and manufactured every single one of them by hand using his automated CNC lathes, grinding and polishing equipment, and then triple tests them before shipping them to the user. As good as these 82 eyepieces are, if your budget allows, you might want to consider an even wider 100 eyepiece. The main drawback is the massive 833 gram weight, by far the highest of the 100s. Eyepieces with 100 apparent fields of view provide the widest actual fields possible at any given focal length (with the exception of the few 110 and 120 models on offer). Get the monthly weather forecast for Munich, Bavaria, Germany, including daily high/low, historical averages, to help you plan ahead. That's easier with the smaller size of the 82 Naglers when compared to the 100 eyepieces, however I'm working on that. I find I kind of have to make myself use them more often. Grade Conversion using the Bavarian Formula. But I'm thinking a pair of the 16's might make a nice selection for binoviewers. Also, I view with eyeglasses because of my severe astigmatism. I test ZWOs new ASIAir Mini. The grades represent the following assessments of the examination performances: Talent Development, Scholarships and Awards, Verification of Study Periods for Pension Insurance, Mission Statement and Teaching Constitution, TUM Center for Digital Leadership Development, Digital Programs of Executive and Professional Education, Office of the Senior Executive Vice President, TUMonline TUMs campus management portal, Academic and Examination Regulations (FPSO), resolution of the Kultusministerkonferenz, 1.01.5 very good: excellent performance, 1.62.5 good: performance well above average, 2.63,5 satisfactory: average performance, 3.64.0 sufficient: performance meets the standards in spite of deficiencies, from 4.1 fail: performance does not meet the standards because of substantial deficiencies. Edited by timmbottoni, 03 November 2014 - 08:49 PM. Get a chair! Make no mistake, these are large and heavy eyepieces, with some requiring 2-inch focusers. I saw clear, sharp, spacious views of Jupiter and the Moon when I first tried this eyepiece, and it also works well on double stars. The eyepieces name comes from Wide-Angle Long-Eye-Relief and its Canadian designer Glen Speers. 100 degree eyepieces are quite amazing but they are also very large and can be quite heavy. Theres a new alternative for the Celestron NexStar SE and NexStar Evolution series tripod a short, foldable tabletop tripod. Once you look through eyepieces with 82 apparent fields, all lesser eyepieces give the impression of looking down a tunnel. Today, they report 4mm, 8mm, and 15mm and are $50 apiece less expensive, at $149 each. But viewing with glasses on is still possible. I have the WO versions of these and find them very good, indeed! The failure rate, resolution, sharpness, and other subtle differences were there. Are you looking for a List of Universities in Germany for International Students? This my first refractor, my first telescope with quality optics, my first telescope with a wide field of view, and my first telescope with a decent focuser (among other firsts) so I am very excited and anxious to get my hands on it. Explore Scientific 11 mm - 82 Argon Purged Waterproof 1.25" Eyepiece SKU: EXS-EPWP8211-01 Focal Length: 11 mm Apparent Field of View: 82 degrees Barrel Size: 1.25" Eye Relief: 15.6 mm Free shipping $229.99 In Stock Add to cart As low as $7.43/Month Apertura 9mm - 27mm Zoom Eyepiece SKU: APT-ZOOM927 Focal Length: 9mm - 27mm The eye has to be a little above the eyecup for best position, with eye relief just 12mm. Waiting Period: We are in continuous production and operate one year in advance. Cons: Heavy and 2-inch only; shorter eye relief. Though advertised as 80, I found the apparent field matched a Naglers 82 field. There are also 60 degree eyepieces like the Starguider ED and Paradigms. They were identical to the UWANs (and 5 other brands of the same eyepieces). How are the new Orion SkyQuest dobsonians? Looks like at this time they are all available. 51,000 students. Just received the set. I do most of my observing with 82 degree eyepieces. For Messier 24 ("Delle Caustiche") even in short focal scope 100 deg. Our EUW eyepieces are now loaded into AstronomyTools database and application. This counterweight system is used to quickly adjust balance on smaller telescopes when eyepieces of different weights used. That doesn't happen with 100 degree eyepieces. Click here to simulate the field of viewhttps://astronomy.tools/. This is the largest and heaviest of the 1.25-inch eyepieces, with a mass of 400 grams. New from SV? and they are currently also sold under the labels: Aah but they are new new to Stellaruve. I think these are the same that WO(?) Field stops are different. Will 1.25 inch eyepieces fit ES coma corrector? : I find the 82 degree fields of my Explore Scientific 9mm to be less accessible, though it is a nice sharp view. The rubber eyecup can be raised higher with the use of an included extension ring; a twist-up mechanism would have been preferable. I just purchased a SV80A (really excited) and they had deal going where you get the 8mm and 15mm for a little over $100 so I jumped on it. It just felt like a 68-degree field that was pushed slightly further out. While the NexStar SE/Evolution Celestron, Celestron Tabletop Tripod, NexStar SE. Be informed, it can't hurt you. I still focused on the field stop and never got the spacewalk views others enjoy. I tested it side by side with my 9 mm Nagler on my SV-105 and I could not see any difference. Thanks. Eye relief is a very long 20mm. They were identical to the UWANs (and 5 other brands of the same eyepieces). The eyepieces rival Televue but they were sold to fund an Ethos. In short, I found it uncomfortable to use. MyGermanUniversity.com is Germany's largest database for English-language Bachelors and Masters programs (refers to degree programs with at least 50% English-taught course modules from German universities). I can easily watch a close double drift past the field stop of a type 6 Nagler and often do. Stars are sharp across all but the outer 15 percent of the field and are still tight at the edge, though with some lateral chromatic aberration. All of these factors add up to create an extremely contrasty eyepiece that is free of unwanted reflections, flaring or ghosting. Super crisp images to the edges. Honestly, I don't mind a 50-degree view, but 70 is definitely more immersive. Edited by betacygni, 05 March 2023 - 10:45 AM. Hmmm, looks like those four focal lengths are the only ones they make, at least for now. if(sWOTrackPage)sWOTrackPage(); A year ago, they had 3 focal lengths of 82 eyepieces of 4, 7, and 16mm, and I reported them in the 2016 Guide to eyepieces. I've owned all the WO UWAN in the past but sold off all of them except the 4mm. Pros: Great optics; comfortable eye relief and eyecup. Introducing the new Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle eyepiece series.This ultra wide field eyepiece has almost 3 times the area of a 50 degree eyepiece. An important factor is whether you have astigmatism in your observing eye and need to wear glasses when observing,. 15mm Stellarvue is identical to the 14mm ES 82, field curvature and all, as noted above. Oh, barlowed the 15mm starts to show curvature around the 80-85% mark for my eye and the 4 and the 8mm the same since already barlowed. The one piece of information I have not been able to find here or on other forums is what FOVs people prefer, whether the specified field of view is at specific focal lengths or in general. At 564 grams even with its 2-inch adapter tube, Stellarvue's Optimus is the lightest of the 100 set, a consideration for balancing smaller telescopes. They look very much alike the new TS UWANs, but with a special Stellarvue twist reminiscent of their 100 line. Eye relief is an excellent 17 mm, longer than in more premium models, and the eyecup is extendable. All of my scopes are on manual mounts, so I agree, the larger the AFOV the better. I do not wear glasses while observing and a 70-degree field of view is very comfortable. The apparent field is indeed noticeably wider than the other 82s. Cheers. The 16 and 7mm looked diffierent than these didn't they? Accessories, Astrophotography gear, Reviews. Very fast shipping and packaging. Edited by David E, 08 October 2014 - 08:14 PM. public University. This is a recommended complete set of eyepieces for use with any Stellarvue telescope from the SV70T to the SV152 Flagship! I tested several eyepieces advertised as having 100 fields, all with focal lengths from 13mm to 15mm, a good sweet spot for any eyepiece on most telescopes, and encompassing the focal length of the original 13mm Nagler and Ethos models from Tele Vue. Theres a new alternative for the Celestron NexStar SE and NexStar Evolution series tripod a short, foldable tabletop tripod. I tested this set on f/6 apo refractors and f/5 to f/6 Newtonian reflectors, concentrating on comparing on-axis and off-axis sharpness. I test ZWOs new ASIAir Mini. These wider fields allow me to see things with my peripheral vision and make the whole experience that much more comfortable and enjoyable. Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) #48, Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) #52, private (state-approved) University of Applied Sciences, View all 231 courses still open for next intake, Marketing services for German Universities. I had been planning on getting ES 82 degree EP's, but I just couldn't pass these up for the $. The TeleVue eyepieces are very sharp across the field, the Astro-Tech eyepieces slightly less so but they provide essentially the same views, just not quite so perfect. EPs: ES 2 . I've been looking at purchasing some additional eyepieces from those that came with my AD8 Apertura (9mm and 30mm). I bought this and the 4.7mm on a whim when picking up an SV60. I recently purchased the 9 mm Optimus eyepiece after my excellent experience with the 20 mm Optimus. Astromania now sells a 32mm, but I suspect it is a 31mm Luminos. How are the new Orion SkyQuest dobsonians? I briefly experimented with a 100-degree eyepiece but it felt exactly like the 82-degree field, with the exception of shorter eye relief. The contrast is good and the view is clear from edge to edge. #32 Times Higher Education Ranking. While not as wide as the others, the Morpheus comes close, so I included it. Several functions may not work. Taken out of the original box for pictures only. The 28mm has a 2" barrel, the rest are 1.25". At a measured 13mm, eye relief seems a little tight, and 1.5mm less than specified, due to the eye lens being more deeply recessed than in the others. Has anyone out there tried both or have any thoughts? Despite its size and dual barrel, its mass is only 586 grams, less than some of the competitors. This eyepiece gives me 133x mag in my 10 inch Dobsonian. Faster scopes (below f5.9) are more sensitive and require more expensive EP's and a probably a coma corrector. Old thread, but thought I would ask here first just in case instead of starting something new Stellarvue is running a sale on a 3 piece set of their 82 degree eyepieces for $292 while ES 82's are on sale for $99 each. Very comfortable, bright and sharp. We have the same scope, so I can give you a few pointers to consider. Well to be honest, United Optics products tend to be quite good, whether branded as WO or SV, or something else. Effect of barlows / field flatness for AT60ED solar imaging, Jon Isaacs, SpaceConqueror3 and mrsjeff like this, sportsmed, edsmx5 and Someone4322 like this, Dave Mitsky, John Huntley, CeleNoptic and, izar187, pj_thomas and Alex Swartzinski like this. You would recognize the names of the OEMs if I told you. The Stellarvue Ultrawide eyepiece set includes three eyepieces: 4.0 mm 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degree apparent field of view(click here for specifications), 8.0 mm 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degreeapparent field of view (click here for specifications), 15.0 mm 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degreeapparent field of view(click here for specifications). Nuff said! Several functions may not work. They slap on the "15mm" on the side and everybody assumes it is actually 15mm, when it is really 14mm. I have a tendency to increase the apparent field as the magnification goes up so I don't have to push the dob quite as much. This 9 mm eyepiece is ideal for moderate power work on moons, planets and dark sky objects. Cons: Soft off-axis star images. Because they're Stellarvue! I need at least 22mm of effective eye relief. This is like binge watching 4 seasons of a great show with a total cliff-hanger at the end of season 4, only to have the network cancel the show. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. While still impressive, they arent as wide as the others. Pros: Great optics; wider field; comfortable eye relief and eyecup. As such, the Nagler Type 6s are showing their age, as newer models of eyepieces, including Tele Vues own Delos series, provide adjustable eyecups and much longer eye relief, important for us aging observers! Stars are sharp across all but the outer 10 to 15 percent of the field, so very close to Nagler performance. *Measured with eye cup rolled down. Bottom Line: A better bargain 82 eyepiece. 3. His website at www.amazingsky.com has galleries of his images, plus links to his product review blog posts, video tutorials, and ebooks on astrophotography. In my scopes, I generally use the 3.5 mm Nagler with the 2X TV Barlow as my highest magnification. Those look just like the WO UWANs, and they are in the exact same focal lengths. On the 2-inch focusers on my Newtonians I had to pull the eyepiece out a little in the draw tube to have it reach focus. This is not recommended for shared computers. For me, anything 60 degrees or greater feels sufficiently wide. I have a tendency to increase the apparent field as the magnification goes up so I don't have to push the dob quite as much. Below shows the 100 degree Ethos alongside the 82 degree Nagler. In the AD8 . He (or his expertly trained staff)machines optical tubes and adapters, polishes lenses, fabricates altazmounts, and yes his triple testing of his refractorsis now legendary! Pros: Solid construction with good eye relief. I recently upgraded my 30mm that came with my Dob to a APM 30mm UFF and its a great EP. 70 is fine at low power, 78-85 fine at medium power, but I prefer 110 at high power. The 8-element Morpheus design provides nearly top-class performance for much less than the premium competition, which would also include Tele Vues 72 Delos series. The eyepieces rival Televue but they were sold to fund an Ethos.I missed the 16mm and regretted it as it's a very useful focal length. Here is a good listing of who actually makes applianceshttp://www.appliancehase/make.shtml. Why 5 stars? Build quality 2nd to none.., relatively light for it's size.., but most of all the view is spectacular, all the way out to that wide 100 degree FOV. The new TS UWANs are waterproof and filled with nitrogen. The field is so wide it can be hard to see the edge of the field. If so, you will need eyepieces with longer eye relief. I ordered mine from Omegon and overseas delivery was prompt. You will get more use out of middle and low magnification EP's now. Add 1/8" if rolled up. For a lighter, lower-cost alternative, and for 1.25-inch focusers, you might wish to consider an 82 eyepiece. But I'm interested in the 16mm as I don't have a UWA in that focal length (I used to have the old 5000 series Meade 18mm UWA but sold it). The Stellarvue 82 is well made, with a compact, solid construction, good 14mm of eye relief (better than the stated 12mm) and a fold-up eyecup. Which points out that the appropriate high power apparent field depends a lot on the focal length of the scope and whether the scope is tracking. His website at www.amazingsky.com has galleries of his images, plus links to his product review blog posts, video tutorials, and ebooks on astrophotography. I have a 4.5mm Morpheus and a 4.7mm Ethos SX. Edited by jrbarnett, 08 October 2014 - 02:40 PM. For low power, large FOV, I recommend you limit the eyepiece focal length to ~35 mm (thus a 7 mm exit pupil.) I've spent a decent amount of time with an 82-degree eyepiece, but the extra field never seemed very immersive to me. There's also a comfort factor. I'm hoping they will be sharp to the edge at f/7. While the NexStar SE/Evolution Celestron, Celestron Tabletop Tripod, NexStar SE. Click here to create one. I find there are very few choices when it comes choosing a high quality 70 to 82 AFOV design that have enough eye relief for me to see the entire FOV. To be totally fair, not all eyeglass wearers are the same or require the same amount of eye relief. They're still well regarded, though the 28mm is said to be ergonomically awkward to view through. In the AD8, the APM delivers tack-sharp stars to the edge. So that this makes sense - take your 30mm SuperView, focus on a nice cluster of stars (M45 akaPleiades is a great one). LMU - Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitt Mnchen. I have never used 100o EP's but they are larger/heavier so you might have balance issues depending on scope/mount setup. With the 20 mm I will then have 32, 20, 16 and 10 mm equivalents. Note: For definitions of basic eyepiece characteristics mentioned below, see Ed Tings A Beginners Guide to Telescope Eyepieces. Don't have an Astromart account? Building an set of eyepieces takes some time. Ive never been a fan of zoom eyepieces. Stars begin to distort in the outer 25 percent of the field, so worse than the Explore Scientific and Tele Vue Ethos, but still very good, especially for the price. The Meade and Omegon represent great values. In the 10 inch, that's 820x, the TFoV is slightly less than 6 arc-minutes, 1/10 of a degree. Anyone know who makes the StellarVue Planetary eyepieces? Edit: For clarification, I am referring to the apparent field of view of eyepieces, not the true field of view. They are probably another variation of the UWANs, thought the specified focal lengths have been changed from 7mm to 8mm and from 16mm to 15mm. I see only two, a 9mm and a 6mm. Munich, German Mnchen, city, capital of Bavaria Land (state), southern Germany. This is a great moderate power wide field eyepiece for viewing all kinds of deep sky objects, the moon and planets. }. Reducer Flatteners for other telescopes, Finderscope Eyepieces with Focusing Reticle, Barlows to double the power of your eyepieces, Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle Eyepiece Set - EUW-SET, Stellarvue Optimus Eyepiece Set with Case - EOP-SET, Stellarvue 4 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-04.0, Stellarvue 15 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-15.0, Stellarvue 8 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-08.0. But I still prefer the Ethos SX on Uranus and Neptune because it gives me a much longer time between nudges and that allows me to relax more when looking. This is a superb eyepiece for the money, with the bonus of argon-filled waterproof construction to keep moisture from penetrating and fogging the eyepiece on humid nights. (2011) 1,348,335; (2021 est . (Yeah, yeah, I know that's asking a lot.). Haven't noticed these before. Omegon in Germany offers many unique products such as their Panorama2 eyepieces. Can't beat it for the price, especially since the market has gone insane. (Cheaper products abound, but you never know what you'll get. You probably won't notice the difference. The 13mm Televue Ethos is $658, the Televue 13mm Nagler is $335. Posted by Steve Lightstone on 8th Aug 2020. I find that the longer the focal length of the scope, the more I wanted wider apparent fields. The A-T 28UWA/StellarVue 82 and APM 30UFF has already been mentioned in this thread. You may see the shadow of the secondary mirror with this eyepiece and exit pupil. Cool, thanks for the info! Joining an astronomy club can also put more eyepieces in your focuser to the test. For planets 30-40 deg. Cons: Very aberrated off-axis star images; slightly less than 82 field. It is likely KUO like the WP Meade UWA, who also make the UWAN/PWA. Yes, for standard 1.25" and 2" eyepiece filters. In my 80/480 refractor, I find even 50 degrees for "high" power to be quite good--e.g., Nagler 3-6 zoom. Optical performance also proved similar, with stars in the Meade beginning to distort 60 percent out from the center and appearing fairly aberrated at the edge of field. You currently have javascript disabled. Having tried 52, 60, 70, 76 and 82, I'll stick between 70 and 82. LMU - Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitt Mnchen, Macromedia University of Applied Sciences, Mediadesign University of Applied Sciences. FWIW I looked at the Pleiades yesterday with a 32mm Plossl, a 24mm UFF (~65 AFOV) with my XT10 which has the same focal length as your telescope. For 1.25" 82 eyepieces, I have a mixed set of Televue, ES, and UWA. Thanks for the input, I appreciate it. Performance is excellent, with stars sharp across all but the outer 10 percent of the field. And it is just for 2-inch focusers and so requires 2-inch filters. Drift time is about 20 seconds. Bottom Line: The best for optics but others provide more comfortable viewing. Kunming UWA reskins. The Explore 100 comes a very close second to Tele Vue in sharpness, with stars sharp across 90 percent of the field and still well contained at the edge. $65 a piece is very cheapfor these eyepieces, so you did a very good deal there. Optical performance is also identical and excellent for the money. This eyepiece is ideal for higher power work on planets and double stars since it is very sharp, contrasty and has a generous 82 degree field of view. Our EOP eyepieces are now loaded into AstronomyTools database and application. I am fortunate that I do not need to wear glasses.. Over the years, I have built up a collection of eyepieces that includes multiple sets. Introducing the Stellarvue Optimus eyepiece series. Pros: Good off-axis sharpness and eye relief, but . The eyepiece is turned my 115 into a whole new scope for visual observing. My conclusion upon testing this 100 group was that performance was more or less commensurate with price. It is important the image stays sharp as it crosses the field, and it does in both eyepieces, but the Ethos SX is better for double stars and planets. But then again, thats more or less the point the eyepiece gets out of the way so you no longer have the sense you are looking through a round porthole or window. Of the lower-cost 82 models, this was a good choice overall for both optics and mechanics. Maybe Vic star tests these though! I have never used any of the super mega ultra extra wide eyepieces. Note the Meades middle-weight 638 gram mass and that both the Meade and Omegon are just for 2-inch focusers, requiring more costly 2-inch filters. I would be very surprised to find out that this new Stellarvue line is not the same as the new TS UWAN line. Enter the maximum grade, the minimum passing grade, and your current overall grade in the grading system of your university. When I decided that I wasn't agreeing with an eyepiece, I sold it back on the used market for what I paid for it.