Plaintiff will use the definitions of these terms found in Objections 3-4 in responding to this request. /Rotate 0 (15)Tj The serving party must file its motion to compel in the court where compliance is required. q Plaintiff further objects to this definition to the extent that it uses the undefined term "during." /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] BT Assume you receive the following response to your Requests for Production of Documents: Responding party hereby incorporates its general objections as if fully stated herein. Plaintiff objects to Instruction No. 19 0 obj 3. /Contents [120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R] [(c)4 (hr)3.8 (oni)-2.8 (c)4.8 ( t)-1.9 (ox)-10 (i)-2 (c)3 (it)-14 (y)29.1 ( st)-3.1 (udi)-2 (e)3 (s o)-10.9 (n g)10.8 (l)-22.7 (y)20.7 (phosa)1.3 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (, Mo)-2 (ns)-13 (a)4.8 (nt)-2.8 (o )]TJ (2. /Parent 15 0 R [(r)3 (e)4.8 (pe)4 (r)2.2 (c)4 (u)10 (ss)7.8 (i)-1.9 (o)9.1 (ns)9.8 (.\224)3.1 ( )-249.9 (\()2.9 (MON)3 (G)2 (L)11 (Y)2 (00233281)-10.8 (\))2.9 ( )-249.9 ([)-6.1 (Th)1.8 (is)-3 ( R)-3.9 (e)14.8 (q)9.2 (ue)4.8 (s)8.2 (t)-2 ( i)-1.1 (s )-2 (l)-3 (i)-2.9 (s)9 (t)-1.1 (e)3 (d a)4.9 (s )-1.8 (No)2 (. /TT0 12 Tf 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.286072 36 cm << (26)Tj T* [(29, 2017\))2.9 (])-6 (. [( t)-2.8 (ha)4.7 (t)-1.8 ( t)-2.9 (he)4.7 ( c)3.2 (it)-4.1 (e)3.1 (d )]TJ ( )Tj T* >> (1)Tj American Bar Association /GS0 gs )Tj /ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI] f Judges have been saying it for years, and their tolerance for deaf ears is ebbing: Throw away the boilerplate. T* /Type /Catalog In litigation, written discovery typically consists of (1) Requests for Production, (2) Requests for Admission, and (3) Interrogatories. /Type /Page [(oc)4 (c)4.8 (ur)3 (r)-7.8 (e)4.8 (d on or)3 ( a)3.2 (b)-9.1 (out)-2.9 ( S)-4 (e)3.9 (pt)-1.9 (e)4.8 (m)-2.7 (be)4.7 (r)3 ( 4, 1985. 574.8 791.16 0.71 -791.16 re << Build your discovery objections with the same care that you build your case in chief. [( t)-2 (ha)4.8 (t)-2.8 ( t)-2 (he)4.8 ( c)4 (i)-1.9 (t)-2 (e)3.9 (d doc)3.1 (um)-1.9 (e)3.9 (nt)-1.9 ( i)-2 (s )-2 (a)3 ( f)3.8 (or)3 (m)-1.9 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 ( a)-6.9 (ge)4.8 (n)-10.7 (c)-5.2 (y)19 ( d)-9.8 (e)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (m)-1.1 (i)-2 (na)3.1 (t)-1.1 (i)-2 (on of)2.9 ( EP)-2.7 (A)1.9 (. 54 0 obj 0 0 612 792 re [(r)3 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (t)-2 (a)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. /BaseFont /Helvetica [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ Near the end of discovery, it is wise to send out a more case-specific . 0 0 612 792 re 2. sample objections to request for production of documents texas. )]TJ /Subtype /Type1 You may object if the request is asking for your analysis, strategy, or thinking about the case. [(1)-1.296 ( )]TJ At the March 8, 1999 conference with the Court, Defendant's counsel suggested that interview memoranda were discoverable. pD1visp[n5pL3lQtM;-a-VO}]ny]t;pcgj(q =vwVB~dm$ 4H^~#Ead4*KSj:sLGLvBSHr$$UKe;vtT='l6tdfIKq5'H=l#?JzT=A?qjf)$d?RTia&p%NoD]FYD/}@J!>1Za{JZ:LigFmhHgSLI a^xrJgr,6l_. 16 0 obj (7)Tj 2031.050, that allow the propounding party to ask for updated information bearing on answers already made and later acquired or discovered documents, tangible things, land or other property.. (19)Tj (15)Tj and to its attorney of record: 78.23 0 Td T* )-200.8 (27 )-199.1 (i)-2 (n )-190.8 (P)-3.2 (l)-2 (a)13.9 (i)-1.9 (n)9 (t)8.9 (i)-1.9 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 (s)9.8 (\222)13 ( )]TJ /Contents [52 0 R 53 0 R 54 0 R] (NRCP 36; JCRCP 36.) q Q /CropBox [0 0 612 792] Continue Reading WHY THESE OBJECTIONS ARE GARBAGE. (16)Tj /Type /Page 15.83 -48 Td [(S)-3.1 (E)-3.9 (T)-3 ( N)1.9 (O)-1.9 (. (5)Tj (1)Tj /TT1 12 Tf 51.12 0 Td >%9\%_N\>kuq%+"9$~]W-Uj^aRQ /TT1 12 Tf /ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI] Q Q /Resources 59 0 R 1.0999999 0 0 1.0999999 -5.594463 -39.599996 cm (20)Tj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] << T* 6. T* T* T* T* /OCProperties 2 0 R -48.829 -12 Td 36 -24 Td 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 140.6246 75.2636 Tm (10)Tj /OCGs [11 0 R] 100.55 0 Td << [(3)6.8 (4)6.8 (8)21.806 (1)8.095 (2)6.899 (\\)23.898 (6)21.806 (2)6.899 (6)21.793 (1)5.604 (3)21.806 (8)6.8 (3)8.095 (. [(pr)3 (e)4.8 (l)-2.7 (i)-2.1 (m)-2 (i)-1.1 (na)3 (r)-16.9 (y)29.9 ( )20.9 (sc)2.1 (i)-1.9 (e)3.1 (nt)-1.1 (i)7.1 (f)3.8 (i)-1.9 (c)13.9 ( r)3 (e)3.2 (vi)-1.1 (e)3 (w)2 ( a)4.9 (nd e)3.1 (va)4 (l)-1.9 (ua)4.8 (t)-2.8 (i)-1.9 (on of)2.8 ( st)-3.7 (ud)-9.2 (y)19.9 ( )10 (B)6.1 (D)2 (N)2 (-)3.9 (77-)3 (42)10 (0, t)-1.9 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( )-10 (g)9.9 (l)-1.9 (y)19.9 (pho)10 (sa)2.1 (t)-1.9 (e)3 ( )]TJ /Resources 79 0 R stream 67.32 0 Td h 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 312.9666 86.2909 Tm If the request is not reasonably related to any claim or defense, and if there is no good reason to go beyond the ordinary scope of discovery under Rule 26(b), take the time to explain why in your discovery response. [(se)2.9 (r)3 (vi)-1.9 (c)4.7 (e)4 ( h)-10.8 (e)4.8 (r)3 (e)3.2 (o)-10 (f)3.8 (\224)4 ( a)3.2 (s )-2 (pl)-4 (a)4 (i)-2 (nt)-2 (i)-12 (f)2.9 (f)3.9 ( a)4 (ss)-2.8 (e)-6.9 (r)3.8 (t)-2.8 (s,)-2 ( b)-2 (ut)-3.9 ( a)4.7 (r)3 (e)3.1 ( du)-9.9 (e)4.8 ( on )-10.8 (O)1.9 (c)4 (t)-1.9 (obe)4.8 (r)3 ( 16, 2017. (4)Tj /PieceInfo 5 0 R -36 -24 Td >> endobj 29.4 648.61 Td )Tj In its Response to Document Request No. T* (10)Tj 1 g 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.286072 36 cm 306.23 0 Td Q T* Does the 45-Day Rule Apply when no Privilege Log was Served? [(t)-2.8 (he)4.8 ( r)2.9 (e)3.2 (que)4.8 (s)-1.7 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (o t)-2 (he)3.9 ( e)4.9 (x)-10 (t)-1.9 (e)3 (nt)-1.1 ( i)-1.9 (t)-2.1 ( su)-2 (g)8.1 (g)10.9 (e)3.1 (st)-3.8 (s t)-2.3 (ha)3 (t )-2 (M)-12.9 (onsa)1.9 (nt)-1.9 (o ha)4.8 (s)-1.8 ( not)-2 ( )]TJ Q Q (8)Tj acquire the most less latency era to download any of our books afterward this one. -334.67 -24 Td T* /TT0 8.03 Tf 104.03 792 0.83 -792 re Standard objections to discovery requests under the FRCP and the Cal. T* endstream T* /Filter /FlateDecode /Rotate 0 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.575684 36 cm Plaintiff objects to each instruction, definition, document request, and interrogatory to the extent that it purports to impose any requirement or discovery obligation greater than or different from those under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the applicable Rules and Orders of the Court. /Type /Page 31 0 obj Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o a)4 (l)-2 (so)-2 ( )]TJ Q T* 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re (24)Tj stream [(a)4 (de)4.8 (nom)-2.8 (a)4.8 (s,)-1.8 ( a)1.2 ( )-9.8 (r)3.7 (a)4 (r)-7.8 (e)4.8 ( t)-1.9 (um)-2.9 (or)3.8 (, i)-2.7 (n a)4.7 ( dose)1.3 (-)3 (r)-6.1 (e)3 (late)3 (d m)-1.9 (a)4.8 (nn)-9.9 (e)3.1 (r)2.9 (. endobj 0 0 m /Filter /FlateDecode /TT0 12 Tf (1. 123.83 538.67 436.19 -1.19 re /TT0 12 Tf /Resources 123 0 R x%0>7P{o2:Krc\_xJ5= +\n"bL}';.b.5|4}bHXVvK! q 574.8 791.16 0.71 -791.16 re 106.55 66.35 470.88 -0.48 re /TT0 12 Tf ( )Tj Responding party objects as it invades their and third parties right of privacy. 2 to the extent that it calls for documents protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, deliberative process privilege, attorney work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege. When Do I Have to Bring a Motion to Compel Written Discovery? /TT0 12 Tf T* /Parent 14 0 R (18)Tj T* q /PDFDocEncoding 39 0 R /TT0 12 Tf 53 0 obj Dl'|hI;%C^FqT%hE3V*S:.1~~K~|b\?q,E+9N0pg (3. /TT1 12 Tf Judith M. Kinney (DSB # 3643) Assistant United States Attorney 1201 Market Street, Suite 1100 Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 573-6277, This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and. (17)Tj The interviews were memorialized by notes and/or memoranda written by Antitrust Division attorneys and staff. T* /Type /Page q 5. )Tj BT This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or downloaded or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association. 1. /Length 154 0 R [(3)6.8 (4)6.8 (8)21.806 (1)8.095 (2)6.899 (\\)23.898 (6)21.806 (2)6.899 (6)21.793 (1)5.604 (3)21.806 (8)6.8 (3)8.095 (. >> )10.8 ( )]TJ T* /Names 3 0 R << Secure .gov websites use HTTPS q (13)Tj /DR 12 0 R Meaningful steps towards business goals that are accomplished by a project. -103.32 -24 Td /Filter /FlateDecode [(A)1.9 (D)2.9 (M)4 (IT)-4.8 (S)]TJ [(t)-1.1 (ha)3.1 (t)-2 ( Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o ha)4 (s )-2 (no)-2 (t)-3 ( c)3.9 (onduc)4.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d t)-1.9 (ox)-10.9 (i)-1.1 (c)3 (i)-1.9 (t)-12 (y)30 ( st)-3.9 (udi)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-12 (of)3.8 ( sh)-1.8 (or)1.1 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (r)2.1 ( dur)-6 (a)3 (ti)-4 (ons,)-2 ( g)-2 (e)2.9 (n)-10.8 (ot)-2 (ox)-10 (i)-2 (c)4.8 (i)-2.8 (t)-12 (y)30.8 ( st)-4.6 (udi)-2.1 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (, a)4.7 (nd )]TJ [(, t)-1.1 (o pl)-2 (a)3.1 (i)-1.1 (nt)-2 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 (\222)3 (s )-1.8 (F)5.8 (i)-2.8 (r)3.8 (st)-4.7 ( )-9.1 (R)-3 (e)3.9 (que)3.1 (st)-2.9 (s )-2 (fo)2 (r)4.1 ( A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (ss)-3 (i)-1.2 (ons )-2 (\(\223)6.1 (R)-3 (e)4 (que)4.8 (st)-4.6 (s\224)2.7 (\))3 (. %PDF-1.7 34 0 obj A specific response may repeat a general objection for emphasis or some other reason. /Resources 55 0 R >> T* Plaintiff further objects to this request, whether broadly or more narrowly construed, to the extent it seeks production of documents protected by the work product doctrine, the governmental deliberative process privilege, or the attorney-client privilege. 23.207 -24 Td 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.020233 36 cm endobj f q 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm Subject to and notwithstanding this objection, in responding to these discovery requests, Plaintiff will treat the term "third party," as extending to all individuals and entities, not named as parties to this lawsuit, listed on Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures. endobj endobj 1 g A request for such a log is unreasonable and unduly burdensome in light of the work product doctrine, governmental deliberative process privilege, and other privileges protecting such internal documents from discovery. /Type /Pages /Annots [] 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.11554 36 cm /TT1 12 Tf -283.67 -24 Td [(A)1.1 (D)2 (M)4.9 (I)-1.8 (T)-3 (S)]TJ >> 1 0 0 1 152.3695068 766 cm /Contents [88 0 R 89 0 R 90 0 R] endobj 3 0 obj >> 0 -24 TD Plaintiff further objects to Definition No. CCP, which can be used in other jurisdictions as well. q 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.286072 36 cm (26)Tj << 2. [(de)4 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (r)13 (m)-1.9 (i)8.7 (na)14 (t)-1.9 (i)7.1 (on t)-1.9 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( g)9.8 (l)-11.8 (y)29.9 (phosa)11.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( w)2.9 (a)4 (s )-1.8 (on)-1.8 (c)2.1 (og)10.9 (e)3.1 (ni)-1.9 (c)4 ( \223)4.8 (w)2 (o)-10.8 (ul)-1.1 (d ha)3 (ve)4.9 ( )9.1 (se)3 (r)3 (i)-1.9 (ou)9 (s )-1.8 (ne)3 (g)9.1 (a)4.9 (t)-2.8 (i)-2 (ve)-5.1 ( e)3 (c)4.9 (ono)9.1 (m)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (c)3 ( )]TJ /XObject 146 0 R 49 0 obj [(a)4 (nd 4041 of)3.8 ( t)-2.8 (he)4.8 ( hi)-11.9 (g)9.9 (h-)3 (dos)-11.7 (e)3.9 (, a)4.8 (nd m)-2.8 (a)4.8 (l)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( 3023 of)2.2 ( t)-2 (h)-10 (e)4.8 ( )-9.9 (m)-2 (i)-2 (d-)2.9 (dose)1.2 ( gr)3 (oup\224)4.9 ( a)4 (nd t)-1.9 (ha)3 (t)-11.9 ( \223)4.8 (G)2 (l)-11.9 (y)19 (phos)-10.7 (a)4.7 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( w)-8.7 (a)4.7 (s )]TJ /TT0 12 Tf 214.8 0 Td To)2 ( t)-10.7 (he)3.9 ( e)4.8 (x)-9.9 (t)-2 (e)3.1 (nt)-1.1 ( t)-2 (ha)3.1 (t)-1.1 ( pl)-2 (a)3.1 (i)-1.1 (nt)-2 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 ( su)-1.8 (gg)8.9 (e)3.2 (st)-2.2 (s )-2 (t)-3 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.9 (r)-7.7 (e)4.7 ( w)2 (a)3.2 (s )-1.8 (no)-1.8 ( )-10.9 (r)-6.2 (e)3.1 (se)2.1 (a)4.8 (r)-7.7 (c)4.7 (h or)3 ( )]TJ 100.44 792 0.83 -792 re Plaintiff can only know those facts, of which it is aware, that are known to such individuals and entities. Objection made to requests for production of document that do not exist or not in the attorney or party's possession violate an attorney's ethical duty under Bus & PC 6068 (d) to act truthfully and, therefore, constitutes bad faith. cancel sybaris reservation. /Resources 107 0 R The court then separated the motions to compel from the motions to strike and refused to rule on the motion to strike stating There is no such motion.Is the court correct?. (10)Tj (11)Tj 12 0 obj T* /TT1 12 Tf endobj /TT0 12 Tf endobj [(M)-1.8 (onsa)2.8 (nt)-12 (o obj)-2 (e)3.1 (c)4 (t)-1.9 (s )-2 (t)-2.2 (o t)-2 (he)3.1 ( phr)3 (a)4.9 (se)1.9 ( )-10.7 (\223)3.9 (c)-5.9 (hr)2.9 (oni)-1.9 (c)3.9 ( t)-1.9 (ox)-9.2 (i)-2.8 (c)4.7 (i)-1.9 (t)-12 (y)29.9 ( st)-3.7 (ud)-20.9 (y)20.8 (\224)4 ( )-10.8 (a)4.8 (s)-1.8 ( va)4.7 (g)10 (u)-9.9 (e)3.1 (, be)-5 (c)3 (a)4 (use)3 ( )]TJ /Type /Metadata T* << /PageElement 38 0 R Q )Tj T* 51.12 0 Td 33 )10.8 (i)-1.9 (n P)5.1 (l)-1.1 (a)13.1 (i)-1.1 (n)9.9 (t)-2.7 (i)-2 (f)12.9 (f)3 (s\222)1.8 ( A)11.1 (m)-1.8 (e)4.7 (n)9.2 (de)4.8 (d a)14 (nd )9.1 (S)-3.9 (u)10.8 (ppl)-1.9 (e)13.9 (m)-1.9 (e)13.9 (nt)-2.8 (a)14 (l)-2 ( R)-3 (e)4 (q)10 (ue)4 (s)9 (t)-1.1 (s )-2 (fo)2 (r)4 ( )10 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (ss)-3 (i)-2 (ons)-1.8 ( \()3.7 (J)-10.9 (une)3 ( 29, )]TJ [(2017\))2.9 (])-6 (. Court408 F.3d 1142, 2005 WL 1175 922 (9th Cir.2005) [trial court affirmed in holding boilerplate objection without identification of documents is not the proper assertion of a privilege. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm 0 -446.832 l [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-2.8 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( E)10.9 (P)-3 (A)1.9 (\222)2.1 (s )9 (H)2 (a)13.9 (z)-5.9 (a)4 (r)13 (d Ev)2 (a)15 (l)-1.9 (ua)13.9 (t)7.1 (i)-1.9 (on D)1.9 (i)-1.9 (v)10.8 (i)-1.9 (si)-4 (on, on)9 ( or)3 ( a)4.9 (bou)10 (t)-2.8 ( )9.9 (S)-3 (e)3 (p)10.9 (t)-1.9 (e)13.9 (m)-2 (be)4 (r)2.1 ( 4, )]TJ /TT1 12 Tf -103.32 -24 Td /TT0 9.96 Tf T* -287.434 -24 Td 0.71 -686.832 l By RFP No. 0.428 -431.088 l << 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 82.1952 679.0819 Tm Plaintiff objects to this document request to the extent that it calls for production of a privilege log for internal documents of Plaintiff. T* -154.07 -24 Td A request for such a log is unreasonable and unduly burdensome in light of the work product doctrine and other privileges protecting such internal documents from discovery. /Artifact <>BDC T* 13009 issued to Dentsply by the DOJ in connection with its antitrust investigation of Dentsply prior to the filing of its complaint on January 5, 1999," that definition gives no greater meaning to the phrase "CID investigation," unless it is intended to limit the interrogatory to those individuals and entities interviewed by Plaintiff pursuant to Civil Investigative Demand Number 13009. Dont say if anything is being withheld on the basis of the objection. f /TT1 12 Tf 6. [(M)-1.496 (ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. Official websites use .gov /Subtype /Type1 3365 )-3.002 (\222)-4.297 (S)1.697 ( )-1.898 (R)3.203 (E)-14.408 (S)1.707 (P)-10.201 (ON)-2.701 (SES )-3.203 (T)-15.502 (O )-2.902 (P)-10.201 (L)8.504 (A)10.1 (I)-4.197 (NT)-16.305 (I)-5.402 (F)1.707 (F)1.797 (\222)8.695 (S)1.807 ( )-15 (F)1.697 (I)-4.297 (R)-8.705 (S)1.707 (T)-14.408 ( )-2.992 (R)4.297 (E)-4.398 (QU)-1.707 (E)-5.201 (S)2.6 (T)-15.392 (S )-1.506 (F)1.697 (OR)3.504 ( )-2.902 (AD)-1.697 (M)-3.303 (I)-5.402 (S)-9.197 (SI)-3.002 (ON)-1.697 (S)-11.998 ( )]TJ The above is an example of inappropriate boilerplate objections. /Kids [24 0 R 25 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R 28 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R 39 0 obj [(A)-7.1 (D)1.9 (M)3.1 (IT)-3.9 (S)]TJ 51.12 0 Td All of the depositions taken of individuals listed in Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures, all documents produced by the individuals and entities listed in these Disclosures, and all of the correspondence from such individuals and entities listed in such Disclosures have already been, or are being, produced to the Defendant. 2019-01-28T14:14:04-08:00 /TT0 12 Tf Before serving this document, make an appointment for free legal information and advice at one of the Legal Help Centers. << ( )Tj 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 313.0823 86.2909 Tm Plaintiff further objects to this interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent it seeks information that is readily or more accessible to Defendant from Defendant's own files, including, but not limited to, interrogatory answers that Defendant produced to Plaintiff, transcripts of depositions of current or former directors, officers, and employees of Defendant, documents that Defendant produced to Plaintiff, and correspondence and other communications from Defendant to Plaintiff. /TT1 12 Tf /Rotate 0 64 0 obj << f 65.4 648.61 Td 47.75 0 Td /Contents [100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R] \()3.1 (MON)2.8 (G)-8.7 (L)11.7 (Y)1.2 (04269006-)3 (07)-9.1 (\))2.9 ( [)-7.8 (Th)1.8 (is)-2.9 ( R)-2.2 (e)3 (q)10 (ue)4 (s)9.9 (t)-1.9 ( i)-2 (s )-2 (l)6 (is)-3 (t)-2 (e)3 (d a)4 (s )8.1 (N)2 (o. [(obj)-1.1 (e)3 (c)4.1 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.1 (ons )-2 (a)2.9 (s )-1.6 (t)-2.8 (o c)3.6 (om)-1.7 (pe)4.6 (t)-2.7 (e)-6.1 (nc)3.9 (e)4.9 (, r)3 (e)3.1 (l)-11.9 (e)4.8 (va)3.2 (nc)-5.1 (e)3.9 (, m)-1.9 (a)3 (ter)4.9 (i)-11.9 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (i)-2 (t)-2.9 (y)20.8 (,)-10.7 ( pr)2.8 (op)-9 (r)2.9 (i)-1.9 (e)3 (t)-21 (y)19.9 (, a)3.1 (nd a)4.9 (dm)-2.8 (i)-2 (ss)-3 (i)-12 (bi)-2 (l)-1.1 (i)-2 (t)-12 (y)29 (, )-9.9 (a)4.8 (nd a)4 (n)-19.9 (y)19.9 ( a)3.1 (nd )-9 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (l)-2 ( )]TJ C)-3 (ode)4 ( \247 )]TJ by Practical Law Litigation Maintained California A Practice Note explaining how to draft and serve a response to a request for production of documents (RFP) (also called an "inspection demand" or "document request") in a California unlimited civil action. /Contents [84 0 R 85 0 R 86 0 R] ( )Tj [(g)10.8 (l)-11.9 (y)29.1 (phosa)2.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( )-229 (be)13.9 (t)-1.9 (w)1.9 (e)3.2 (e)13.9 (n )-199 (199)9.9 (1 )-200.8 (t)-2 (h)10.8 (r)3 (oug)10 (h )-209.9 (2017. application/pdf (3)Tj -72 -24 Td T* /TT1 12 Tf [(D)2 (E)-2.9 (N)1.9 (IE)-4.9 (S)]TJ << Project objectives often include both objectives and goals.Project objectives should not be confused with project management objectives. 44.76 0 Td This sample is used to request an opposing party to produce specified documents that support their claims or defenses. Improve lighting insulation by installing lightning arrestors in the last phase of the project. /RBGroups [] /Rotate 0 26 April 2023 . (10)Tj 0 -791.16 l /Contents [104 0 R 105 0 R 106 0 R] REQUESTED DISCOVERY IS NOT CRITICAL TO PROVING THE ASSERTED CLAIMS OR DEFENSES /Fm0 Do The Southern District of New York again illustrates the point. T* endobj /TT1 12 Tf << Instead, the California Discovery Act has two statutes, C.C.P. (7. q /TT0 12 Tf 26 0 obj EMC 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 140.5293 75.2636 Tm Continue Reading DISCOVERY GAMES AND MISCONCEPTIONSWhat is Wrong with this Document Response? GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. DISCOVERY GAMES AND MISCONCEPTIONS Is the Court Correct That There is No Motion to Strike in Discovery? (8)Tj T* 106.55 66.35 470.88 -0.48 re OBJECTIONS: Relevance. /TT1 12 Tf /TT0 11.03 Tf 51 0 obj /ZaDb 41 0 R T* endobj 33 0 obj In its responses, the defendant asserted boilerplate objections. Q [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s )]TJ T* The statutes all contain the same language, but its not that easy to decipher. /Count 14 q /TT1 12 Tf endobj See my blog Make Sure you are aware of the New Document Response Requirementsfor an updated analysis. Missing that thirty-day deadline can be serious. 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 4.5757 36 Tm Objections Sometimes, rather than responding about your ability to produce the requested documents or things, you may object to the request on legal grounds. (9)Tj >> [(Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o w)2 (i)-2 (l)-1.1 (l)-2 ( c)3.1 (onst)-2.2 (r)2.1 (ue)4 ( a)-5.1 (l)-2 (l)-2 ( R)-3.9 (e)4.8 (que)3.2 (st)-2.2 (s )-2 (a)2 (s e)3.1 (x)-9.1 (t)-2.9 (e)4.8 (ndi)-1.9 (ng)9.1 ( onl)-12 (y)20.8 ( t)-1.9 (o i)-2.9 (nf)3.8 (or)3 (m)-1.9 (a)3 (ti)-4 (on a)3 (nd d)-9.9 (oc)4.8 (um)-1.9 (e)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (a)3.1 (t)-1.1 (i)-2 (on t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( a)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( )]TJ